The ACLU recently faced a legal setback in Iowa, where it tried to prevent state officials from investigating the citizenship status of around 2,000 registered voters. Iowa officials clarified that they were not removing anyone from the voter rolls but would require those flagged to fill out provisional ballots until citizenship was verified.

The ACLU argues that such investigations might deter recently naturalized citizens from voting, but Iowa maintains that only confirmed non-citizens would be affected. According to the state, provisional ballots would be a fair solution, allowing every individual the opportunity to vote while still ensuring only citizens participate in the final tally.

Some critics argue that the ACLU’s stance prioritizes inclusivity over electoral integrity, especially in key states like Iowa, where every vote could make a difference. Ensuring that only eligible citizens vote is a priority for many, and Iowa’s approach attempts to balance inclusivity with voter integrity. For now, the case highlights a growing debate over how states handle the complexities of voter eligibility