The iPhone 12, a product of the multinational technology company, Apple, has found itself the subject of a recent controversy. Allegations have arisen that the smartphone, launched in 2020, emits radiation levels exceeding the permitted limits.

The French authorities have issued a command to halt the sale of the iPhone 12 in the country, warning of potential recalls for devices already sold. This decision has sparked a debate, with other European countries, including Germany and Spain, contemplating similar measures. French regulatory bodies have even proposed deploying agents to Apple stores to ensure the smartphone’s sales cease.

Apple, however, has refuted these allegations, maintaining that the iPhone 12 adheres to all global radiation standards. The tech giant has also highlighted that the smartphone has received certification from multiple international bodies.

To support its stance, Apple has presented lab results, conducted both in-house and by third-parties, which confirm the phone’s compliance with radiation standards.

Mobile Phones and Health Risks: What Do We Know?

Over the past twenty years, numerous studies have been undertaken to investigate the potential health risks associated with mobile phone usage. Yet, the World Health Organization states that no conclusive evidence links mobile phone use to adverse health effects. Professor Rodney Croft, of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, which establishes global guidelines on radiation limits, has echoed this sentiment.

He explained that radiation from phones does not pose a risk to users, and regulatory limits on radiation are set a full ten times below the level where scientists have found evidence of harm.

The discrepancy between the French authorities’ conclusions and Apple’s assertions may stem from differences in testing methods. The ANFR, the French watchdog tasked with assessing radiation, uses a testing methodology that assumes direct skin contact between the device and the user. This approach differs from the testing method employed by Apple, potentially explaining the divergent findings.

This controversy underscores the importance of unified testing methods and transparent communication. As technology continues to evolve and become an even more integral part of our daily lives, companies, regulatory bodies, and consumers must strive for a shared understanding of the potential health implications of these device.so