While Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer has impressed audiences with its practical effects, there's growing concern about the environmental impact of such filmmaking techniques. The question arises: Could CGI be the solution?

Practical effects have long been favoured for their tangible authenticity, but they come with significant ecological drawbacks. From waste generation to carbon emissions, the toll on the environment cannot be ignored. Embracing CGI offers filmmakers the chance to tell compelling stories while reducing their carbon footprints and minimising waste.

The film industry has a responsibility to actively address its environmental impact. A recent study revealed the staggering amount of carbon dioxide produced by big-budget blockbusters, and practical effects are a major contributor. By transitioning to CGI for explosive sequences, filmmakers can make a positive change.

Of course, some argue that practical effects offer a unique cinematic experience that CGI cannot replicate. However, modern technology has advanced to the point where CGI can deliver stunningly realistic visual effects. By finding the right balance between practical effects and CGI, filmmakers can maintain authenticity while being mindful of the environment.

In the face of rapid climate change, the film industry must adapt its practises to reduce its carbon footprint. While Oppenheimer's practical effects were awe-inspiring, future filmmakers should consider the ecological consequences and explore eco-friendly alternatives.

Ultimately, the marriage of storytelling and environmental consciousness can lead to groundbreaking cinematic experiences that leave a positive impact on both audiences and the planet.