As Beijing unveils its latest 'White Paper' on Tibet, referring to the region as 'Xizang,' concerns are mounting in India's power corridors. The move is perceived as an attempt by China to assert control and erase the cultural identity of Tibetans, raising worries in New Delhi about the implications for India's northern border in the Himalayas.

Since the annexation of Tibet by China in 1950, propaganda efforts have been underway, with the recent 'White Paper' showcasing developments in Tibet under President Xi Jinping. Analysts suggest that China's use of 'Xizang' instead of 'Tibet' is a deliberate move to stamp its authority on the region, contributing to the erasure of cultural identity.

India's security is seen at risk, especially considering China's reference to Arunachal Pradesh as 'Zangnan,' a part of 'Xizang.' Clarity on this from segments of Chinese civil society is deemed crucial in countering Beijing's narratives on Tibet.

The 'White Paper' on Tibet, while presenting a positive image, notably omits critical issues like the colonial boarding school system and massive relocation programs affecting Tibetan culture. Observers draw parallels between this approach and Mao Zedong's strategy in the 1950s, emphasizing development narratives without addressing core concerns.

As Xi Jinping employs political narratives akin to Mao's, exiled Tibetans accuse him of religious repression and cultural erosion, leading to protests and self-immolations. The unfolding situation in Tibet raises broader questions about China's narrative playbook and its impact on South Asian countries, adding layers of complexity to regional dynamics.