That's shameful and I'm sure that's not how any woman, including your wife, would like to be seen. That's disrespectful to her.

Anyway, as per your argument, childfree couples – the heterosexual ones – should have their marriages annulled, right? And a lot of queer people can actually procreate. So basically you agree that marriages have nothing to do with sexuality and a traditional marriage is not exclusive to heterosexual couples, am I right? As long as they can give birth, anyone can marry, like you said.

It doesn't make sense, does it? That's what I'm saying. There's no argument that you can bring in that would completely include all straight people of the world and exclude all queer people. That's because your arguments are faulty and carry no real reasoning.

Traditional marriages as a concept are super problematic and I'm not only saying that because it excludes gay people but also because it is just a display of power imbalance where women are looked at as nothing more than animals that are meant to breed. Traditional marriages have, statistically, high rates of domestic violence and are usually a show off to the world while being loveless in reality. It's a faulty concept, much like your arguments.

It also marginalizes straight couples that can't have children or don't choose to have children by putting shame to them which leads to more power imbalance in society and conflict in their own marriage. Not to mention, it severely and negatively affects their mental health.